No, I didn't change what I said, you just misunderstood from the start. When I said 'LH equivalent of cultivators', I was referring to the difficulty of tracking the MC's progress within the cultivation system, precisely because the game doesn't provide clear subdivisions like LH/PH. This is completely different from saying that the MC doesn't have a level of power or progress comparable to the Houtians, which is what I stated immediately afterwards."If you mean the LH equivalent of cultivators... Who knows? So far the only way to compare is to use Yue Fang as a reference, but this doesn't help much, the guy isn't someone who started out as a normal mortal after all." is what you said and you clearly didn't mean power levels (relative to MAs) there based on what you said on this and "However, if you're referring to actual LH... Then I'm confident that no, MC has already surpassed LH, even PH I'd say." (clearly septating the two and actually meaning power levels here)
Your second reply "Interpreting the Houtian as a road, we can say that an EH is someone at the beginning of the road and a PH someone at the end. So saying something like "the LH/PH equivalent of cultivators" is intuitive and understandable." also doesn't really mention power levels
so no it's not "that’s interpretation based on available evidence". It's called changing your words
I separated the two points:
One is about the internal structure of the cultivation system (where we only have Qi Condensation as a big, vague stage). Here, I mentioned Yue Fang, a Cultivator, as the only possible true comparison so far, but explained that it wasn't useful because his strength doesn't say much about his progress in the Realm, then I used the metaphor of the road and applied the Houtian stages as equivalent references to progress;
The other is about what the MC can do in combat compared to MAs, where the parallel with LH/PH also makes sense as a strength reference.
You confuse complementary explanation with contradiction. And to accuse of 'changing words' when the context has been explained from the beginning is not only unfair - it's lazy.
Instead of trying to invalidate my arguments and methods with out-of-context semantics, re-read carefully. My point remains the same as it was at the beginning: since the game doesn't give formal stage transitions, using equivalences with LH/PH to illustrate strength and relative progress is useful and totally coherent with what has been said, even commonly used.