Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.

[jhanjha]

Practical Explanation ( For Example ) :- `1st of all can you tell me every single seconds detail from that time when you born ?? ( i need every seconds detail ?? that what- what you have thought and done on every single second )

can you tell me every single detail of your `1 cheapest Minute Or your whole hour, day, week, month, year or your whole life ??

if you are not able to tell me about this life then what proof do you have that you didn't forget your past ? and that you will not forget this present life in the future ?

that is Fact that Supreme Lord Krishna exists but we posses no such intelligence to understand him.
there is also next life. and i already proved you that no scientist, no politician, no so-called intelligent man in this world is able to understand this Truth. cuz they are imagining. and you cannot imagine what is god, who is god, what is after life etc.
_______
for example :Your father existed before your birth. you cannot say that before your birth your father don,t exists.

So you have to ask from mother, "Who is my father?" And if she says, "This gentleman is your father," then it is all right. It is easy.
Otherwise, if you makes research, "Who is my father?" go on searching for life; you'll never find your father.

( now maybe...maybe you will say that i will search my father from D.N.A, or i will prove it by photo's, or many other thing's which i will get from my mother and prove it that who is my Real father.{ So you have to believe the authority. who is that authority ? she is your mother. you cannot claim of any photo's, D.N.A or many other things without authority ( or ur mother ).

if you will show D.N.A, photo's, and many other proofs from other women then your mother. then what is use of those proofs ??} )

same you have to follow real authority. "Whatever You have spoken, I accept it," Then there is no difficulty. And You are accepted by Devala, Narada, Vyasa, and You are speaking Yourself, and later on, all the acaryas have accepted. Then I'll follow.
I'll have to follow great personalities. The same reason mother says, this gentleman is my father. That's all. Finish business. Where is the necessity of making research? All authorities accept Krsna, the Supreme Personality of Godhead. You accept it; then your searching after God is finished.

Why should you waste your time?
_______
all that is you need is to hear from authority ( same like mother ). and i heard this truth from authority " Srila Prabhupada " he is my spiritual master.
im not talking these all things from my own.
___________

in this world no `1 can be Peace full. this is all along Fact.

cuz we all are suffering in this world 4 Problems which are Disease, Old age, Death, and Birth after Birth.

tell me are you really happy ?? you can,t be happy if you will ignore these 4 main problem. then still you will be Forced by Nature.
___________________

if you really want to be happy then follow these 6 Things which are No illicit s.ex, No g.ambling, No d.rugs ( No tea & coffee ), No meat-eating ( No onion & garlic's )

5th thing is whatever you eat `1st offer it to Supreme Lord Krishna. ( if you know it what is Guru parama-para then offer them food not direct Supreme Lord Krishna )

and 6th " Main Thing " is you have to Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare ".
_______________________________
If your not able to follow these 4 things no illicit s.ex, no g.ambling, no d.rugs, no meat-eating then don,t worry but chanting of this holy name ( Hare Krishna Maha-Mantra ) is very-very and very important.

Chant " hare krishna hare krishna krishna krishna hare hare hare rama hare rama rama rama hare hare " and be happy.

if you still don,t believe on me then chant any other name for 5 Min's and chant this holy name for 5 Min's and you will see effect. i promise you it works And chanting at least 16 rounds ( each round of 108 beads ) of the Hare Krishna maha-mantra daily.
____________
Here is no Question of Holy Books quotes, Personal Experiences, Faith or Belief. i accept that Sometimes Faith is also Blind. Here is already Practical explanation which already proved that every`1 else in this world is nothing more then Busy Foolish and totally idiot.
_________________________
Source(s):
every `1 is already Blind in this world and if you will follow another Blind then you both will fall in hole. so try to follow that person who have Spiritual Eyes who can Guide you on Actual Right Path. ( my Authority & Guide is my Spiritual Master " Srila Prabhupada " )
_____________
if you want to see Actual Purpose of human life then see this link : ( triple w ( d . o . t ) asitis ( d . o . t ) c . o . m {Bookmark it })
read it complete. ( i promise only readers of this book that they { he/she } will get every single answer which they want to know about why im in this material world, who im, what will happen after this life, what is best thing which will make Human Life Perfect, and what is perfection of Human Life. ) purpose of human life is not to live like animal cuz every`1 at present time doing 4 thing which are sleeping, eating, s.ex & fear. purpose of human life is to become freed from Birth after birth, Old Age, Disease, and Death.

 

[DEMONKINGAK]

Btw not to be rude . But did someone ask you about the purpose of life in the fourm

 

[jhanjha]

Btw not to be rude . But did someone ask you about the purpose of life in the fourm

im also not trolling or being rude with you as well. but what does off topic section means than ? do you know it as well ?

 

[DEMONKINGAK]

Dude I am just asking what motivated you to find the purpose of life. Again not being rude.and why are you thinking about next life , first live this life to the fullest.

 

[jhanjha]

Dude I am just asking what motivated you to find the purpose of life. Again not being rude.and why are you thinking about next life , first live this life to the fullest.

so what is the difference between human beings and animals ? if we both do sleeping, eating, mating and defending ? huh? animals are also doing these things without being educated and civilized modern man is doing same after getting university education. so what is the difference?

what do you think is the aim of human life ? to have one wife, one car or bike, one job, and one house and than in india we think we becomes demigods and our life is perfect, is it not ? and have two kids and kill the rest using contraceptive methods.

so anyways, just tell me what do you think purpose or aim of our life is too ?

 

[DEMONKINGAK]

Dude human are mammals and mammals are animals the only reason we get education and live in the society called civilized society is because human have a superiority complex. And think we are the greatest that why even in mythology god's care more about human than any other species cause we assume he will care more about the superior species . Again not being rude .

 

[DEMONKINGAK]

And for the purpose of life . If we knew what is the purpose of life then wouldn't it became meaningless.and life shouldn't have a purpose otherwise it will mean there is no free will . Life is something we should life to it fullest. Again not being rude .

 

[jhanjha]

Dude human are mammals and mammals are animals the only reason we get education and live in the society called civilized society is because human have a superiority complex. And think we are the greatest that why even in mythology god's care more about human than any other species cause we assume he will care more about the superior species . Again not being rude .

now let me answer this quickly for you, difference is this much that human beings can be educated to understand the problems of life, and humans are awarded with greater intelligence to understand God or Krsna, where as animals cannot understand it.

and we go to schools for getting educated to understand what is the aim of life, but unfortunately real mother ( in analogy recognized agents of Lord Krishna such as Devala, Asistha, Vyasdeva, Narada muni and currenctly Srila Prabhupada ) replaced with pr0stitutes ( modern says scholars, psychologists, philosophers, or anyone who claims to be intelligent one ) and they are denying the existence of father, and getting listened with same faith with which previously real mother ( like real recognized bona fide authorities used to get as i named Devala, Asistha, Vyasdeva, Narada muni and currenctly Srila Prabhupada etc ) used to get.

just like you calls the gods mythology, but just tell me how do you call the existence of God mythology ?

just tell me how do we recognize an ordinary biological father ? whom no one sees before their births ? huh? how do we recognize him ? and because we did not saw him before our birth that means it is mythology that there is father ? huh? otherwise you are not scientifically advance, just tell me how do we recognize an ordinary biological father even ?

 

[jhanjha]

And for the purpose of life . If we knew what is the purpose of life then wouldn't it became meaningless.and life shouldn't have a purpose otherwise it will mean there is no free will . Life is something we should life to it fullest. Again not being rude .

there is purpose of human life, to get released from repeated birth after birth, old age, disease and death. here is that Practical explanation main post upside under the thread title that is what is purpose of human life is.

and if we die to utilize this material body to the utmost limits to the last point by doing sleeping, eating, mating and defending than there are next 8.4 million forms of lives. as it is common saying in india chukiya ne caurasi hai.

 

[DEMONKINGAK]

now let me answer this quickly for you, difference is this much that human beings can be educated to understand the problems of life, and humans are awarded with greater intelligence to understand God or Krsna, where as animals cannot understand it.

and we go to schools for getting educated to understand what is the aim of life, but unfortunately real mother ( in analogy recognized agents of Lord Krishna such as Devala, Asistha, Vyasdeva, Narada muni and currenctly Srila Prabhupada ) replaced with pr0stitutes ( modern says scholars, psychologists, philosophers, or anyone who claims to be intelligent one ) and they are denying the existence of father, and getting listened with same faith with which previously real mother ( like real recognized bona fide authorities used to get as i named Devala, Asistha, Vyasdeva, Narada muni and currenctly Srila Prabhupada etc ) used to get.

just like you calls the gods mythology, but just tell me how do you call the existence of God mythology ?

just tell me how do we recognize an ordinary biological father ? whom no one sees before their births ? huh? how do we recognize him ? and because we did not saw him before our birth that means it is mythology that there is father ? huh? otherwise you are not scientifically advance, just tell me how do we recognize an ordinary biological father even ?

Dude who are you to say that animal are not intelligent and can't understand the problem of life , they have there own struggles and the also find ways to solve them . Dolphin can lay mud traps , they can talk far distance with each other. Ants are called the greatest architects and there and there body brain ratio is 1:7 ( where as human have a ratio of 1:40) . And even in india the wisest god is Ganesha who have a head of an elephant ( which is also an animal). And dude if I want to know if someone is my biological father we have something called DNA test . And even if someone is not your biological father but is with you since you gained conciousness I will consider him my father . Because parenthood is not about giving birth and then abondening them it's about raising them.again not being rude

 

[DEMONKINGAK]

there is purpose of human life, to get released from repeated birth after birth, old age, disease and death. here is that Practical explanation main post upside under the thread title that is what is purpose of human life is.

and if we die to utilize this material body to the utmost limits to the last point by doing sleeping, eating, mating and defending than there are next 8.4 million forms of lives. as it is common saying in india chukiya ne caurasi hai.

If you know the purpose of life then why don't you fulfill it. And if there are no diseases, pain , struggles then could you even consider it life. Even the god vishnu take birth as a rama and lived a life of struggles and then died if Even a god die then who can we say the purpose of life is to leave the cycle of life and death . Again not being rude . And not criticizeing any religion.

 

[DEMONKINGAK]

chukiya ne caurasi hai. And dude I don't know if I am not aware of this saying or you spelled this wrong cause I never heard it.

 

[jhanjha]

Dude who are you to say that animal are not intelligent and can't understand the problem of life , they have there own struggles and the also find ways to solve them . Dolphin can lay mud traps , they can talk far distance with each other. Ants are called the greatest architects and there and there body brain ratio is 1:7 ( where as human have a ratio of 1:40) . And even in india the wisest god is Ganesha who have a head of an elephant ( which is also an animal). And dude if I want to know if someone is my biological father we have something called DNA test . And even if someone is not your biological father but is with you since you gained conciousness I will consider him my father . Because parenthood is not about giving birth and then abondening them it's about raising them.again not being rude

so far animals goes so they do not care for God, for anything. they are intelligent enough in these sleeping, eating, mating and defending and they do not have much problems but humans have such basic problems even.
________________________________
than DNA is also matching with many other people as well, for doctors are transplanting entire hand or legs from someone who is neither our parents nor relatives, that also after matching hand or legs size, age, gender, skin color, tone, etc upto DNA, bone marrows, blood groups etc.

so here goes DNA test, now tell me how do we recognize an ordinary biological father even ? and it is not mythology that there is God or fathre before our birth, just because you have not seen him before your birth.

so how do we recognize him ?

 

[DEMONKINGAK]

Dude human did not have these problem , humans created these problems themself . First sleeping every living being sleeps even gods so it's a basic requirement, then eating human first used to hunt for survival like any other species then the started to hunt to show off which made many species extent just because they wanted to feel superior to one another, mating that a basic to populate and u and animal all do it , then defending and living being love to defend themselves so even now humans kill so many animals, fish and etc and no one talk about it , but if someday an animal tries to defend themselves by attacking an human who is trying to harm them we make big news about it .

No dude about the dna , you can get blood and organ from non relative, ever heard of the adam eve theory it state that human started populating from two people that means in someway all of us have one same ancestor and hence can give each other organs

And dna of each individual is different just like fingerprints and the test check if the person dna is more than 50% similar to the parents because of this inherent genes.

 

[jhanjha]

If you know the purpose of life then why don't you fulfill it. And if there are no diseases, pain , struggles then could you even consider it life. Even the god vishnu take birth as a rama and lived a life of struggles and then died if Even a god die then who can we say the purpose of life is to leave the cycle of life and death . Again not being rude . And not criticizeing any religion.

but Lord Viṣṇu, or Vāsudeva, ( as well as Rama ) is always transcendentally situated. Even though He accepts the quality of goodness of the material world, He is still transcendental to all the material modes. The following example will clear that matter more explicitly. In the prison house there are the prisoners and the managers of the prison house. Both the managers and the prisoners are bound by the laws of the king. But even though the king sometimes comes in the prison, he is not bound by the laws of the prison house. The king is therefore always transcendental to the laws of the prison house, as the Lord is always transcendental to the laws of the material world.

In many Vedic literature Kṛṣṇa is described as the purāṇaḥ puruṣaḥ, the oldest. Purāṇaḥ puruṣaḥ nava-yauvanaṁ ca (Bs. 5.33). Although He is the oldest of all, still, He is always like fresh youth, nava-yauvanaṁ ca. So how it is possible? you are trying to understand God. Sometimes they paint the picture of God as very old man. Because He is the original person, so by this time He must have become very old. This is imagination. This is not actually the form of the Lord.

The form of the Lord is there in the Brahma-saṁhitā and other Vedic literature. Even Śaṅkarācārya, who is a impersonalist, he has accepted Lord Kṛṣṇa as the supreme Nārāyaṇa. In his comment on Bhagavad-gītā he says, nārāyaṇaḥ paraḥ avyaktāt: "Nārāyaṇa is beyond this material creation." And while describing Nārāyaṇa, he has affirmed, sa bhagavān svayaṁ kṛṣṇaḥ: "That Nārāyaṇa is Kṛṣṇa." And he has clearly mentioned, "Now He has appeared as the son of Devakī and Vāsudeva," to confirm just like identification is confirmed when the father's name is there.

So Kṛṣṇa is para-tattva, accepted by all ācāryas. We are not talking of the fools and rascals who are theorizing without any knowledge. We are concerned with the authorities. So authorities . . . especially in India, the whole Vedic system is being followed by the people under the authorities of the ācārya. Ācāryavān puruṣo veda. One who is following the path of the ācāryas, he knows. Ācāryavān puruṣo veda. We cannot accept anyone as authority if he does not follow the paramparā, disciplic succession of ācārya. That is the Vedic system. Evaṁ paramparā-prāptam imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ (BG 4.2). So Kṛṣṇa is para-tattva.
_____________________

anyways, here is the

 

[jhanjha]

chukiya ne caurasi hai. And dude I don't know if I am not aware of this saying or you spelled this wrong cause I never heard it.

it just means if you missed this human form of life, The life mission, this human form of life mission, is to understand Kṛṣṇa and relation. you're neglecting that. you have no information; therefore you do not gain. and than next is again 8.4 millions forms of lives. from which we have came through the evolutionary process.

 

[DEMONKINGAK]

but Lord Viṣṇu, or Vāsudeva, ( as well as Rama ) is always transcendentally situated. Even though He accepts the quality of goodness of the material world, He is still transcendental to all the material modes. The following example will clear that matter more explicitly. In the prison house there are the prisoners and the managers of the prison house. Both the managers and the prisoners are bound by the laws of the king. But even though the king sometimes comes in the prison, he is not bound by the laws of the prison house. The king is therefore always transcendental to the laws of the prison house, as the Lord is always transcendental to the laws of the material world.

In many Vedic literature Kṛṣṇa is described as the purāṇaḥ puruṣaḥ, the oldest. Purāṇaḥ puruṣaḥ nava-yauvanaṁ ca (Bs. 5.33). Although He is the oldest of all, still, He is always like fresh youth, nava-yauvanaṁ ca. So how it is possible? you are trying to understand God. Sometimes they paint the picture of God as very old man. Because He is the original person, so by this time He must have become very old. This is imagination. This is not actually the form of the Lord.

The form of the Lord is there in the Brahma-saṁhitā and other Vedic literature. Even Śaṅkarācārya, who is a impersonalist, he has accepted Lord Kṛṣṇa as the supreme Nārāyaṇa. In his comment on Bhagavad-gītā he says, nārāyaṇaḥ paraḥ avyaktāt: "Nārāyaṇa is beyond this material creation." And while describing Nārāyaṇa, he has affirmed, sa bhagavān svayaṁ kṛṣṇaḥ: "That Nārāyaṇa is Kṛṣṇa." And he has clearly mentioned, "Now He has appeared as the son of Devakī and Vāsudeva," to confirm just like identification is confirmed when the father's name is there.

So Kṛṣṇa is para-tattva, accepted by all ācāryas. We are not talking of the fools and rascals who are theorizing without any knowledge. We are concerned with the authorities. So authorities . . . especially in India, the whole Vedic system is being followed by the people under the authorities of the ācārya. Ācāryavān puruṣo veda. One who is following the path of the ācāryas, he knows. Ācāryavān puruṣo veda. We cannot accept anyone as authority if he does not follow the paramparā, disciplic succession of ācārya. That is the Vedic system. Evaṁ paramparā-prāptam imaṁ rājarṣayo viduḥ (BG 4.2). So Kṛṣṇa is para-tattva.
_____________________

anyways, here is the

To claim that God is both “the oldest” and yet “eternally youthful” (nava-yauvanaṁ ca) involves a tension in logic. Either God is subject to the laws of time (and ages) or not. If not, then calling Him “the oldest” becomes metaphorical, which dilutes the literal power of scriptural declarations.
Saying “God is the oldest but always youthful” appears poetic rather than philosophical. It may work theologically, but it lacks explanatory power from a rationalist len
s.
The argument heavily relies on ācāryas and scriptural authorities like Śaṅkarācārya to validate the claim that Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme. While this may hold weight within the Vedic system, from a critical standpoint, appealing to authority (argumentum ad verecundiam) doesn't constitute objective proof.
Just because ancient or respected persons said something doesn't make it universally true. Belief rooted in paramparā may offer spiritual insight but lacks empirical or falsifiable basis.
If Kṛṣṇa is transcendent and omnipotent, yet enters the world as avatāra, why does He permit ongoing suffering and ignorance?
The analogy of the king visiting the prison ignores the ethical implication—why doesn’t the king reform or liberate the prison?
Different traditions—even within Hinduism—have diverse views of the Absolute. For instance:

Advaita Vedānta sees Brahman as impersonal and formless.

Dvaita views God and souls as eternally distinct.

Buddhism and Jainism reject the concept of a creator deity altogether.
To claim “Kṛṣṇa is para-tattva, accepted by all ācāryas” ignores these vast internal debates. Śaṅkara did offer devotional verses to Kṛṣṇa but ultimately taught impersonalism.

 

[jhanjha]

Dude human did not have these problem , humans created these problems themself . First sleeping every living being sleeps even gods so it's a basic requirement, then eating human first used to hunt for survival like any other species then the started to hunt to show off which made many species extent just because they wanted to feel superior to one another, mating that a basic to populate and u and animal all do it , then defending and living being love to defend themselves so even now humans kill so many animals, fish and etc and no one talk about it , but if someday an animal tries to defend themselves by attacking an human who is trying to harm them we make big news about it .

No dude about the dna , you can get blood and organ from non relative, ever heard of the adam eve theory it state that human started populating from two people that means in someway all of us have one same ancestor and hence can give each other organs

And dna of each individual is different just like fingerprints and the test check if the person dna is more than 50% similar to the parents because of this inherent genes.

so anyways, sleeping, eating, mating and defending is common between human and animals, and biggest blunder of human history is pr0stitute ( these modern philosophers, psychologists, scholars etc ) are replaced with real mother ( recognized agents of Lord Krishna such as Devala, Asistha, Vyasdeva, Narada muni, Srila Prabhupada etc )

and we are listening to them with same faith with which previously real mother used to get. but only problem is they are calling mythology the existence of father, which is not possible under any circumtenses.
________________
keep one thing always in your mind that you may be or may be not able to recognzie an ordinary biological father, but you can never say that there is no father before our birth ( for that is an empirical fact which no power can deny ) and it is mythology etc nonsense.

now anyways, your DNA test is finished with entire hand or legs transplantation, now tell me how do we recognize an ordinary bioligcal father even ?

 

[jhanjha]

To claim that God is both “the oldest” and yet “eternally youthful” (nava-yauvanaṁ ca) involves a tension in logic. Either God is subject to the laws of time (and ages) or not. If not, then calling Him “the oldest” becomes metaphorical, which dilutes the literal power of scriptural declarations.
Saying “God is the oldest but always youthful” appears poetic rather than philosophical. It may work theologically, but it lacks explanatory power from a rationalist lens.
The argument heavily relies on ācāryas and scriptural authorities like Śaṅkarācārya to validate the claim that Kṛṣṇa is the Supreme. While this may hold weight within the Vedic system, from a critical standpoint, appealing to authority (argumentum ad verecundiam) doesn't constitute objective proof.
Just because ancient or respected persons said something doesn't make it universally true. Belief rooted in paramparā may offer spiritual insight but lacks empirical or falsifiable basis.
If Kṛṣṇa is transcendent and omnipotent, yet enters the world as avatāra, why does He permit ongoing suffering and ignorance?
The analogy of the king visiting the prison ignores the ethical implication—why doesn’t the king reform or liberate the prison?
Different traditions—even within Hinduism—have diverse views of the Absolute. For instance:

Advaita Vedānta sees Brahman as impersonal and formless.

Dvaita views God and souls as eternally distinct.

Buddhism and Jainism reject the concept of a creator deity altogether.
To claim “Kṛṣṇa is para-tattva, accepted by all ācāryas” ignores these vast internal debates. Śaṅkara did offer devotional verses to Kṛṣṇa but ultimately taught impersonalism.

so you have become so advance that now you will talk nonsense that there is no father before our birth ? because it is lacks explanatory power from rational lens ? huh?

than i may ask you how do we recognzie an ordinary biological father ? huh? and do not repeat that broken DNA fallacy, for that is already gone and finished by entire hand or legs transplantation.

and under no circumtenses you can say that there is no father before our birth. so how do we recognize him ? huh? and also tell me that why should i listen to any random child like you ?

 

[DEMONKINGAK]

Dude not being rude but what is your obsession with this ( now tell me how do we recognize an ordinary bioligcal father even ?) it's like u have a feud with dna test ,lost any cases in court . Again not being rude just asking?