I wouldn't call Geralt 'compelling'. To me, a Slav woman, he was quite frustrating (again, I am talking about the book one), though interesting and I do like him. What I meant was that Geralt is the protagonist of the WItcher series, but he is NOT a protagonist of the world around him by any means. Also a big difference is that we meet Geralt when he is well-established as a person, while Wayfarer MC is in their mid-20s which is just the time when you stop being a total mess and start figuring things out.No way you're comparing this IF to Witcher. Witcher has a really compelling and competent MC in the likes of Geralt.
You basically can:
- persuade the count, confront him, kill basilisk, kill count, save the guard, get no injuries, go with the viridian lady with whom you strie a deal, get money (the 1st ending I got tbh and then I REALLY struggled to try and find the other ones)
- get sidetracked and fail everything
- fail moderately and get saved by imperial folks
- agree to work for imperial folks and then they'll bail you out like it's a nbd
- get knocked out, get lore bits, cool scar and and get a bunch of pity and romance points form Aeran, if that's your thing.
See, this is where I'd say it's to each their own because to me Golden Rose was a snoozefest; tho for me it's the setting that does it, mostly. To me Wayfarer MC is the same I'd expect my starting level DnD MC to be when they are thrown into a high-stakes campaign, so I am fine with it. From what I have seen, the first 3 chapters are basically a prologue\set up, and MC will get their agency and such by chapter 4, if we ever live long enough to see it.I mean, the MC of golden rose is just a mercenary, but the way they are written oozes MC energy.