This time your arguments were better, but it doesn't refute me completely. Take a look:
You wrote "I used it to invalidate your [...] if we use him as a basis, the 'unpredictable' becomes 'predictable' point". Trying to attack the basis of my argument, saying that using Ruo's past growth to predict its current level is flawed, but you don't prove that it's flawed or how it's flawed, I based my estimate on concrete events in history, and you haven't demonstrated why those events wouldn't be valid as a reference. The two and a half years is a solid reference precisely because it's Ruo we're talking about, Hao Fan said that Ruo trained like a fanatic, non-stop during all this time, to the point where the Elders were worried. To expect that he would somehow manage to train even harder and achieve such explosive growth as to rival or surpass Yang Gan, while still being a LH, in a few months is not rational but an exaggerated estimate.
Then you wrote "I wasn't arguing that Ruo has no measurable limit. I would be saying he could be X or S level currently then...", but that doesn't answer the original question. I never said that you claimed that Ruo had no limit. The point was about what that limit would be based on the available data, and you have yet to prove that approach wrong.
Lastly, you wrote "What the motivation thing is that it is a complete refute to '[My theory]'..." Here you have a valid point, I assume you mean: "If Ruo really intends to advance quickly, this could contradict the idea that he is testing his limits before advancing". However, you still haven't proved my interpretation wrong. You've only claimed that Ruo's speeches indicate something different, but it can simply be argued that Ruo knows that he will only face mediocre or somewhat strong opponents in these early stages, in which case his current power is objectively sufficient. As for the later stages, there's no point in him saying that he'll finish quickly, because that depends more on the other participants than on him.